Re: master 82c76e3: * lisp/eshell/em-cmpl.el: Try and fix bug#41423

[Stefan Monnier]

> 2. C-h e
> 3. ./bi TAB
>
> Before the commit in question, this gave:
>
>   (metadata
>    (cycle-sort-function . #[...])
>    (category . file)
>    (completion--unquote-requote . t))
>   (#("bin/"
>      0 1 (face completions-common-part)
>      1 2 (face completions-common-part arg-end t rear-nonsticky
>                (arg-end arg-begin))
>      2 3 (face (completions-first-difference)))
>    . 2)
>
> And after:
>
>   (metadata (completion--unquote-requote . t))
>   (#("bin/" 0 4 (face (completions-common-part))) . 0)
>
> Is this expected, or should some of the old information have been
> preserved?

No, this is not expected (i.e. a regression) and having
`completions-common-part` on the whole of "bin/" seems like a bug (not
just a regression).


        Stefan