Re: updating async on elpa

[Stefan Monnier]

> Yes, the name I use -elpa- is bad,

Really?  It sounds like a genuinely natural and intuitive choice to me ;-)

> but yes a repository per repo would be great, in github organizations
> allow having one repo per package like in helm organization.

I know it's more traditional and has its advantages, but currently it's
not really an option.

> What about ((emacs "24.4")) we don't care of 24.3, we are at 27.2 now so
> very far from 24.3.

((emacs "24.4")) would work, yes.  Whether that's better than
((emacs "24.3") (nadvice "0.3")) or even ((cl-lib "0.5") (nadvice "0.3"))
is for the maintainers of Async to decide ;-)

>> - The `async-pkg.el` which is absent on `elpa` and present on `master`.
>>   Do we actually need it on `master`?
> IIRC yes, Melpa needs it.

Why would it matter, since it's on GNU ELPA anyway?


        Stefan