|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Addressing confusion over uninterned symbols |
Date: | Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:16:35 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Are there reasons that macros like macroexp-let2* avoid using gensym? The reason is/was to avoid cons'ing the corresponding strings (I recommend `print-gensym` and `print-circle` for the rare cases where you need to look at the macroexpanded code). Maybe we should have a variant of `print-gensym` which prints the symbol's address along with the rest? Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |