|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: master 432c1aa: Use `pop-to-buffer-same-window' in `project-eshell' |
Date: | Sat, 20 Mar 2021 19:04:24 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 20.03.2021 04:06, Stefan Kangas wrote:
But now `project-eshell' and `project-shell' behave differently, which seems unfortunate. So if this is the behavior we want, shouldn't we change the latter as well for consistency?
Perhaps the answer is to first decide which behavior makes most sense, then make M-x eshell and M-x shell both adopt it, and then do it for project-* versions as well (which would be the easy part)?
Otherwise, the difference in behavior should remain unnecessary evil as long as project-xyz follows xyz.
I'm guessing the average user is more likely to more often use, say, eshell and project-eshell, rather than alternate between shell and eshell evenly.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |