[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 09:33:15 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) |
* Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> [2021-03-19 19:24]:
> Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
>
> > - M-o b -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
> >
> > - C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes
>
> Why not `C-c C-b'?
That is more troublesome as it means there would be no prefix, but
many keys for enriched mode.
M-o i -- for italic is handy
M-o b -- for bold is handy
but C-c C-b -- would be for bold, then C-c C-i for italic?
Doesn't that occupies so many keys? It is not necessary.
Using prefix key for enriched mode is more useful and easier to remember.
Jean
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, (continued)
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/17
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Jean Louis, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Jean Louis, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual,
Jean Louis <=