[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GNU-devel and NonGNU-devel (was: A different way to interactively pass o
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
GNU-devel and NonGNU-devel (was: A different way to interactively pass options to commands) |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:55:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Ah -- I only checked with `M-x list-packages', but it won't show up
>> there until there's a Version header in transient.el (that's bigger than
>> zero), I guess?
>
> Or until you add http://elpa.gnu.org/devel/ to your
> `package-archives`, yes.
Out of curiosity (apologies if these are already answered somewhere):
What are the exact differences in theory and practice between
elpa.gnu.org/devel and elpa.gnu.org/packages, and
elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel and elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu?
Are the devel archives intended as (possibly WIP) counterparts to MELPA?
Based on which criteria are new versions of devel packages released, and
are they subject to :auto-sync in the same way as non-devel packages?
Can the two devel archives be used as drop-in replacements for the
default package-archives?
What are the pros/cons of doing so from a user's perspective?
Thanks,
--
Basil
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, (continued)
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/18
- Development snapshots on GNU ELPA (was: A different way to interactively pass options to commands), Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/02/18
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/19
- GNU-devel and NonGNU-devel (was: A different way to interactively pass options to commands),
Basil L. Contovounesios <=
- Re: GNU-devel and NonGNU-devel, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/21
- Re: GNU-devel and NonGNU-devel, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/24
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Jonas Bernoulli, 2021/02/19
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Clemens, 2021/02/19
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, Jonas Bernoulli, 2021/02/21
- Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands, T.V Raman, 2021/02/21
- Questions about transient (was: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands), Joost Kremers, 2021/02/22
- Re: Questions about transient (was: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands), Jonas Bernoulli, 2021/02/22
- Re: Questions about transient (was: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands), Joost Kremers, 2021/02/22
- RE: [External] : Questions about transient (was: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands), Drew Adams, 2021/02/22