[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Always-true predicate?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Always-true predicate? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:39:01 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Would it make sense to add a function that's exactly the opposite of
> `ignore' (for symmetry and convenience)? If so, what would it be
> called?
Is there real use for it? Is it useful often enough that
(lambda (&rest ignore) t) won't suffice?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- RE: [External] : Re: Always-true predicate?, (continued)
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/17
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Pip Cet, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Pip Cet, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Pip Cet, 2021/02/20
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/20
Re: Always-true predicate?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Robert Pluim, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: Always-true predicate?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- RE: [External] : Re: Always-true predicate?, Drew Adams, 2021/02/19