[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current mode command discovery
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Current mode command discovery |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:18:09 -0600 |
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> This will still result in an order of magnitude fewer annotations than
> doing them for each command.
Why do you think such annotations are a problem?
At least with annotations you don't have to guess if some heuristics
will work, it is immediately clear from reading the code what will
happen.
> I like it because the implementation without annotations should already
> work well enough for one to be able to get the feel of the feature
> (meaning, it will likely work better than the current new feature for
> quite some time, if one takes third-party packages without annotations
> into account).
I for one think the feature is already useful. But it will get more
useful over time, of course.
RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/14
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Matt Armstrong, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/16