[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:48:14 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 2. Create a unified way to repeat the last command with its argument (à la
> "." command in Vi), by binding the existing "repeat" command to a single
> key binding, for example "C-=". With this it also becomes possible to
> change the argument between two repetitions, possibly to something
> different than "opposite". No command must be changed.
Is that different from C-x z?
It could be another binding for C-x z. Perhaps C-= is moreconvenient.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: [External] : Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, chad, 2021/02/01
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/02
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/05
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Juri Linkov, 2021/02/05
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/05
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Juri Linkov, 2021/02/06
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/06
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/06
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Ergus, 2021/02/06
- Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Juri Linkov, 2021/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Richard Stallman, 2021/02/03