[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repol
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:27:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> Maybe Org mode shall switch from using OASIS infested non-free
>> specification to Libreoffice. I could not find those files in
>> Libreoffice folders. But they could be somewhere hidden.
> This is an interesting issue. If you could verify that LibreOffice
> does not contain those nonfree schemas, that would be very good news!
I fear we are out of luck there. Libreoffice documentation at
https://help.libreoffice.org/3.3/Common/XML_File_Formats#Definition_of_the_XML_formats
says "The schema for the OpenDocument formats can be found on the
www.oasis-open.org web site", i.e., it points to the same nonfree files.
I've also checked the Gentoo app-office/libreoffice-7.0.4.2 package,
and it doesn't install any Relax-NG schemas. It only installs DTDs for
the older OpenOffice.org 1.x format. These are licensed under MPL-2.0.
Maybe it's time to contact OASIS Open and ask them if they would
consider relicensing the Relax-NG schemas. Does somebody know one of the
persons from their committee, because that may be a good place to start:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=office
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, (continued)
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, tomas, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/27
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el,
Ulrich Mueller <=
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/27
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/28
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/07
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/13
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/05