[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named-let
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: named-let |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:07:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> As a side note I think we could have full TCO in Emacs, but at the cost
> of a relatively invasive patch and a some (probably small but hard
> to quantify a priori) performance regression. Not sure it is
> sufficiently important to justify that.
That's the question, indeed.
Also, I have the impression that "full TCO" could be difficult if we
consider the mixed case where a compiled function calls an interpreted
function and vice-versa.
Stefan
- Re: named-let, (continued)
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/10
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Helmut Eller, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/13
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/13
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/20