Re: elpa.git and `new-master`

[Juri Linkov]

> I don't have a strong opinion on the specific color of this bikeshed
> ("master" is convenient because it's less work to implement, "trunk" is
> what I got used to back in Bzr days and what I thus keep using locally,
> but "main" is more meaningful (and "virtue signaling")).
>
> My original plan was to rename `new-master` to `master`, but I'd be
> happy to rename it to `main` instead.

For the sake of completion, either `master` or `main` is fine, but
please don't add both branches with the same prefix.  For example,
I use completion on branch names all the time, and it's very convenient
to quickly type just `o TAB m TAB` or `o/m TAB` to complete the
`origin/master` branch.  Having two branches with the same prefix `ma-`
would be a hassle.