[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2020 03:22:43 -0600 |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> I've cleaned up the points about what we should do to add a package to
> NonGNU ELPA. Does anyone suggest any further changes?
One small comment:
> Before we put a package into NonGNU ELPA, we have to look it over and
> make sure it follows the rules. We also have to check that there is
> technically or ethically problematical in it. If users like the
^ "nothing" seems to be missing here
> package and have not complained about it, we can take that as meaning
> it is good to use. But we should also check its namespace usage.
Otherwise, LGTM.
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2020/11/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2020/11/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2020/11/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/28
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/11/29
- Re: NonGNU ELPA,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/11/29
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/11/29
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Andrea Corallo, 2020/11/29
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/11/29
Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/11/21
Re: NonGNU ELPA, Zhu Zihao, 2020/11/23