Re: Removing some workarounds for big integers

[Philipp Stephani]

Am So., 9. Aug. 2020 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>:
>
> On 8/9/20 10:04 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Since we now require C11, that should always be available.
> > We do?
>
> No, we require many (but not all) features of C99. We can use some C11 
> features
> if available, but we don't require any of them.

Fair enough. The current approach with explicit type specifications is
then probably the best we can do for now.