[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:19:34 +0200 |
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 01:14:40 -0700, Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
>>>>> said:
Stefan> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>> But it is true that it would be preferable if the code matched the
>>> documentation. In the interest of consistency we are better off
>>> sticking to one spelling. Note that we already had around 40 other
>>> instances of "parsable" in our source tree.
>>
>> Since renaming symbols involves some pain, do we really need to be
>> 100% consistent here?
Stefan> I personally don't have a very strong opinion either way, FWIW.
I think I prefer consistency between the docstrings and the associated
code to global consistency, and changing code is always risky, so Iʼd
prefer if the docstrings were changed back.
Robert
--
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/09
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Stefan Kangas, 2020/10/09
- RE: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Drew Adams, 2020/10/09
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/10
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Stefan Kangas, 2020/10/10
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/12
- Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos, Stefan Kangas, 2020/10/16