Re: New obsolete.el file for obsolete stuff?

[Stefan Kangas]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> The actual obsolete aliases definitions are usually not the main problem
> (i.e. having this "cruft" mixed in ("scattered") with the normal code
> doesn't do much harm if any)

I sometimes find it mildly distracting to see obsolete definitions when
navigating code.  But this, of course, is a stylistic and highly
subjective point.  I just figured it was worth floating the idea to see
if it would catch on, and I'm perfectly happy either way.

Thanks for commenting.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas