Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete fast-lock and lazy-lock libraries

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Sorry for not being more clear.  I meant deleting
> font-lock-support-mode: it must be declared obsolete first (which
> would require adding the command proposed by Stefan), then, after some
> obsolescence time, we could delete font-lock-support-mode, and then we
> can delete fast-lock and fuzzy-lock.

Ah, okay.  So if I understand correctly we should not pull the trigger
on deleting the libraries fast-lock and fuzzy-lock until we have first
obsoleted and, at a later date, deleted font-lock-support-mode.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas