Re: If undo-only why not a redo-only?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I've seen that we have an undo-only command and a way to customize
> a variable to do so for undo-redo.
> Is it too complex to implement the same to do a redo-only equivalent in
> order to bind that to a different key if the user wants so?

I don't understand what you're asking for.
Could you give some examples of what you'd like to see?

The current code is designed so you can have a "plain old undo+redo"
system by using the commands `undo-only` and `undo-redo`.


        Stefan