Re: Removing no-back-reference restriction from syntax-propertize-rules

[Tassilo Horn]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Looks good.  IRC you had some tests to along with it.  If you could
>>> install them at the same time, that would be great.
>> Of course.  I guess it is ok to only test the shifting function?
>
> Yes.

Done so.

>> Or something more elaborate that puts text in a temp buffer, makes
>> a syntax-propertize-function with syntax-propertize-rules and checks
>> if the 'syntax-table properties get applied as expected?
>
> Any test is better than no test at this point, so ... take your pick.

Right.  Maybe I'll add something like the above to the test later on.
Now I gotta put the kids in the shower. :-)

Bye,
Tassilo