Re: Proper namespaces in Elisp

[Andrea Corallo]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> I'm learning also here that Scheme works on bindings too, good to be
>> ignorant!! :)
>
> Note that Scheme doesn't have `symbol-value`, `set`, nor does it have
> symbol properties.  That makes things quite a bit easier (basically,
> symbols and variables are completely decoupled in Scheme, whereas in
> Elisp they are siamese brethren).

I see.  I guess properties should have a dedicated binding in my proto
(as for function and value has).

-- 
address@hidden