Re: [PATCH] Really prevent quitting in sensitive contexts

[Michael Albinus]

Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Daniel,

> No, it shouldn't. This use of with-local-quit can *never* be correct
> because a stray C-g can *always* interfere with a filter. Don't do
> long-running operations in process filters. Period. The fix isn't to
> make quitting these operations possible in some defined manner. The
> fix is not to do them in the first place.

How do you want to prevent use of such a basic operation like
`file-truename' in a process filter? And yes, in the remote case this
could be a "long-running operation".

Best regards, Michael.