[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?
From: |
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro |
Subject: |
Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:26:49 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Dmitrii Korobeinikov <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:26:36 -0300
>> > On GNU/Linux, Emacs doesn't really return malloc'ed memory to the
>> > system, so once the memory footprint grows, it more or less stays that
>> > way even after GC.
>> Really? Why is that?
> Because that's how malloc/free are implemented in glibc.
I’m surprised to find this out and I’m surprised that the GNU system
overall behaves like that (because its C library does).
How is that not a practical problem? Sometimes I deal with very large
buffers, and it’s not uncommon to have an Emacs uptime of more than a
month. This explains what I thought were memory leaks: Emacs
progressively eating large chunks of memory and eventually leading my
machine to die out of starvation.[1]
Can’t we use an alternative allocator that do return freed memory?[2]
Footnotes:
[1] Not good for my dreams of using a perpetual Lisp machine.
[2] IIRC, I read somewhere that the OpenBSD one does. I wonder if this
and the GC behavior in general has something to do with Emacs being
very slow and unresponsive there. It’s a Lemote YeeLoong, but Emacs
worked fine there on GNU/Linux.
--
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
<http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, (continued)
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/10