[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?
From: |
Dmitrii Korobeinikov |
Subject: |
Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default? |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:59:04 +0600 |
Hi all,
So, I was debugging scrolling, it felt evidently clunky for large
files for me. Font lock is the elephant in the room, but I decided to
profile my custom half-screen scroll functions anyway and was quite
surprised to find that GC was gobbling 38% of the CPU time. That
didn't have anything to do with my functions, the default full page
scroll has it the same.
That lead to some experimenation with gc-cons-threshold. Higher values
of this variable resulted in much less frequent freezes/pauses while
scrolling [1]. Setting garbage-collection-messages to t and
gs-cons-threshold to 80MB, I figured I can scroll a voluminous sheet
of 7k lines before gc has to do its job. With the default 0.8 it's
every 2-3 pagescrolls. That's a big difference.
Of course, raising the threshold significantly higher on its own is
not a very good idea. But if paired with an idle timer like suggested
here [2], then it all starts looking like a decent combination:
(setq gc-cons-threshold mem)
(run-with-idle-timer 2 t 'garbage-collect)
It would be good to find a threshold which the user barely has a
chance of reaching unless running a long uninterrupted task. And, by
the way, in this latter case, it is better to have a higher threshold
too due to the increase in speed, like with startup [3]. Setting the
threshold just a bit higher than the current default wouldn't help
much but may actually be worse as the pauses would be longer, but
about as frequent. Too high a value would create very long freezes for
uninterrupted tasks. But there should be a good middle ground.
So, as far as I can see, defaulting to a higher threshold with an idle
timer could yield better user experience with practically no
significant tradeoffs. Is there something I might be missing here?
Best,
DK
[1] This is evident in vanilla emacs if you pay attention, but it's
much more so for me w/ my the bloated config. I haven't yet found the
culprit.
[2]
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/34342/is-there-any-downside-to-setting-gc-cons-threshold-very-high-and-collecting-ga
[3]
| threshold (MB) | startup time (s) |
|----------------+------------------|
| 0.8 | 9.14 |
| 2 | 8.77 |
| 5 | 7.54 |
| 20 | 6.88 |
| 50 | 6.65 |
| 80 | 6.73 |
| 100 | 6.17 |
- Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?,
Dmitrii Korobeinikov <=
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Dmitrii Korobeinikov, 2020/04/10
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/09
- Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default?, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2020/04/10