[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start. |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:06:34 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:33:58 +0200
>
> > Actually, we had a few detailed profiles posted which show many levels
> > below "somewhere in jit-lock", at least for CC Mode.
>
> When comparing -O0 with -O3 builds I noticed one additional difference
> with simple repetitions of 'scroll-up' in xdisp.c. The optimized build
> spent 25% of the CPU time consumed collecting garbage, the debug build
> 42%. Does an -O0 build produce more garbage or is it collecting slower?
I think the latter. I don't think --enable-checking causes
significantly more Lisp object to be produced. GC is very recursive,
so optimizations that put variables in registers make it faster.
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., (continued)
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Richard Stallman, 2020/04/05
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., andres . ramirez, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., martin rudalics, 2020/04/07
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/07
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/06
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06