[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start. |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:33:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> With this mechanism in place, o-p-i-c-0-i-d-s could safely be left
> enabled, for speed's sake,
FWIW setting `comment-use-syntax-ppss` to nil is likely make things
*slower* in many cases.
This "newish" variable was only introduced so as to have an escape hatch
if it turned out that the new functionality of relying on syntax-ppss
proved problematic.
Given that I haven't seen a single incident reported since that fateful
Dec 12 2017 night, I think we'd be better off removing
`comment-use-syntax-ppss` altogether.
Stefan
- A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Alan Mackenzie, 2020/04/05
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Alan Mackenzie, 2020/04/05
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Richard Stallman, 2020/04/05
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/06
- Re: A proposal for the future of open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start., andres . ramirez, 2020/04/06