Re: policy regarding DEFUNs in subr-x.el

[Štěpán Němec]

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:12:43 +0200
Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> If the no-defun policy should be changed, or if I was mistaken in
>> believing there was one to begin with, shouldn't the commentary
>> recommending compile-time usage be removed, and at least some of the
>> other defsubsts turned into defuns, too?
>
> I don't see that the commentary says the code in this file must be
> inline.  If something in the wording implies that, let's change the
> wording so that it doesn't.

Thank you. In that case I suggest we remove the NB sentence, as IMO it
adds more confusion than useful information.

-- 
Štěpán