[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Mar 2020 08:41:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> [...] I want my files to be 100%
> warning-free.
Yeah, optimally one would!
Here is what I do when `require' and `defvar'
don't it - well, I do it all the time! But
that's when it works, perhaps...
In the Makefile, put
$(MAKE) 2>&1 > /dev/null; $(MAKE)
or in the shell
$ \make > /dev/null; \make
(right, it seems there's no output to stderr to
care about anyway. maybe errors in
make itself?)
Anyway compile twice and even more warnings go
away :)
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/03/01
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/03/01
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/03/01
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Emanuel Berg, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Joost Kremers, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Joost Kremers, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/03/02
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/03/02