[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
|
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
|
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 20:32:42 +0100 |
21 feb. 2020 kl. 20.00 skrev Paul Eggert <address@hidden>:
> On 2/21/20 10:58 AM, Stephen Leake wrote:
>> (string-match "[:alnum:]+" text)
>
> You meant "[[:alnum:]]+".
Or maybe (rx (+ alnum)).
Running relint is also a good idea -- it would have caught the mistake. There
is a similar one in csv-mode in GNU ELPA.
- :alnum: broken?, Stephen Leake, 2020/02/21
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/21
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23