[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terminal locked when spawning a new tty frame
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Terminal locked when spawning a new tty frame |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:58:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Okt 23 2019, Alex Bennée wrote:
> #13 0x000055ed55d1f5f6 in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:714
> #14 0x000055ed55d1f915 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:786
> #15 0x000055ed55d8e2a3 in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=args@entry=0x7ffd0aca1ca8)
> at lisp.h:2109
> #16 0x000055ed55dc1d51 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=<optimized out>,
> vector=<optimized out>, maxdepth=<optimized out>, args_template=<optimized
> out>, nargs=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at bytecode.c:633
> #17 0x000055ed55d8e1ff in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x7ffd0aca2060) at
> eval.c:2808
> #18 0x000055ed55d8e532 in Fapply (nargs=nargs@entry=2,
> args=args@entry=0x7ffd0aca20f0) at eval.c:2424
> #19 0x000055ed55d8e66c in apply1 (fn=<optimized out>,
> arg=arg@entry=0x55ed5d981de3) at lisp.h:1399
> #20 0x000055ed55d8e858 in call_debugger (arg=0x55ed5d981de3) at eval.c:339
> #21 0x000055ed55d8ef01 in maybe_call_debugger (data=0x55ed5d1a9ec3,
> sig=0xe520, conditions=0x7f26ae4ed72b) at lisp.h:1032
> #22 0x000055ed55d8ef01 in signal_or_quit (error_symbol=0xe520,
> data=0x55ed5d1a9ec3, keyboard_quit=<optimized out>) at eval.c:1666
> #23 0x000055ed55c44214 in Fsignal (error_symbol=<optimized out>,
> error_symbol@entry=0xe520, data=<optimized out>) at eval.c:1568
So you have a frame inside the debugger, probably because debug-on-error
is non-nil.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Re: Terminal locked when spawning a new tty frame, rrandresf, 2019/10/16