[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why we SHOULDN'T add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Why we SHOULDN'T add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:59:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 2019-10-19 08:28, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Answer; NOTHING! I want all the facilities of Emacs Lisp Mode whilst
> editing a .dir-locals.el, not to have some overlord determine for me
> what I don't really want.
I anticipated this objection, to some extent, and that's partly why my original
patch made dir-locals-mode inherit from emacs-lisp-mode.
But do you actually want warnings telling you that your file is missing a
(provide '\.dir-locals) form and a ";;; .dir-locals.el ends here" line, as well
as warning about a missing one-line package description at the top at the file,
and a missing ";;; Code:" header? These are part of "all the facilities of
Emacs Lisp Mode" for people whol enable Flycheck and Flymake in that mode.
- Re: Add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el, (continued)
Re: Add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el, Andreas Schwab, 2019/10/17
Re: Add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/17