Re: Image transformations

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > A simpler alternative for the above would be to look at the Emacs
>> > version, and then you don't need most or all of the other tests,
>> > right?
>> 
>> Or did I misunderstand and there are now no architectures without native
>> image scaling?  In that case, this change isn't necessary...
>
> If you test the version, the ImageMagick parts of the test are not
> needed, you need only test image-transforms-p for Emacs 27+.

I'm not quite sure I follow you...  If there are platforms without
native image transforms, then we want to fall back on ImageMagick (if
it's available), even on Emacs 27+.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no