Re: 7 logical-xor implementations in source tree

[Stefan Monnier]

>> define-inline in particular will produce decent code.
>
> I don't think performance is much of a concern here, and would favor
> defining them as functions instead; that's simpler and allows them to be
> used in more contexts when code is written using a functional style.

I'm not advocating the use of `define-inline` for this case, but just
want to clarify that `define-inline` does define a *function*, just like
`defsubst` does.


        Stefan