Re: 7 logical-xor implementations in source tree

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:

> I found myself in need of a logical-xor function. There's `xor' defined in
> array.el. But I don't want my package to depend on array.el. So I grepped the
> git source of some other definition of `xor'. And I found 7 results: 7 
> functions
> doing the same thing, none of them in a satisfactory place.
>
> Should we figure out where to put the "main" `xor' and declare the rest as
> obsolete aliases?

Yes please!  I've had a patch to this effect sitting on a local branch
for a while now.  Will touch it up and send soon.

Thanks,

-- 
Basil