[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crashes in "C-h h"
From: |
VanL |
Subject: |
Re: Crashes in "C-h h" |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jul 2019 19:12:18 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> It is amusing that those benchmarks yield such wildly-different
>> results on different CPUs, though.
>
> That's a mystery in itself, yes. Whether we want to pursue it is
> another matter, as it seems to involve subtle aspects of code
> generation on modern CPUs, something we aren't the best specialists
> in.
Does the mystery lie below the assembly code in microcode? A rule of
thump performant comparison between the latest Intel v. AMD offerings is
good to know. In one market purchase orders are at parity 50-50.
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", (continued)
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/06
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h",
VanL <=
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/06
- [OffTopic] Re: Crashes in "C-h h", VanL, 2019/07/11
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/01
Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Robert Pluim, 2019/07/01
Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Martin, 2019/07/02