[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crashes in "C-h h"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Crashes in "C-h h" |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2019 05:34:59 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:05:32 -0700
>
> 1031-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0 # no operation
>
> real 0m28.150s
> user 0m28.148s
> sys 0m0.001s
> 1032-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0 0 # FIXNUMP+XFIXNUM
>
> real 0m34.229s
> user 0m34.227s
> sys 0m0.001s
> 1033-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0 0 0 # EQ+make_fixnum
>
> real 0m32.213s
> user 0m32.211s
> sys 0m0.001s
>
> which indicates that the EQ+make_fixnum version was about 50% faster
> than the FIXNUMP+XFIXNUM version, once you subtract the overhead of the
> no-op benchmark control.
Is this with USE_LSB or without? I think we need to time both
variants.
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", (continued)
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Andreas Schwab, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/01
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/02
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/03
- Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/03
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h",
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/04
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Pip Cet, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Paul Eggert, 2019/07/05
- Re: Crashes in "C-h h", Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/06