[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master updated (5fdf4fc -> 67c3a3a)
From: |
Ken Brown |
Subject: |
Re: master updated (5fdf4fc -> 67c3a3a) |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 22:28:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 |
On 3/28/2019 3:05 PM, João Távora wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:35 PM João Távora <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Robert Pluim <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:23:09 +0200, Dmitry Gutov
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> said:
>
> Dmitry> On 27.03.2019 20:04, João Távora wrote:
> >> Two questions:
> >>
> >> 1) can I know exactly which of the two commits caused the
> >> problem in hydra.nixos.org <http://hydra.nixos.org>
> <http://hydra.nixos.org>? (Actually,
> >> I think it was 67c3a3 according to Robert's separate
> >> message, but in general is it possible on hydra.nixos?)
>
> Dmitry>
> https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/pipelines?page=2&scope=all
> Dmitry> says that it was indeed 67c3a3.
>
>
> Thanks Dmitry. As I understand there are now two CI systems checking
> Emacs but only one of them checks every commit (and that is the emba
> one). Does it also provide access to the `x-tests.log` files?
>
> As did my git bisect. gcc 7.3, FWIW. Ancient, I know :-)
>
>
> Thanks, it is indeed "worth" something, since problems have arisen due
> to different GCC versions before. And it's not a question of being ancient
> it's a question of that being valuable information.
>
> Anyway, the tests fail with GCC=8.2 as well: they passed on my local test
> run for some reason (probably an oversight with stale .elc on my part).
> I'm working on a fix: you can give me a couple of days or revert
> 67c3a3 if it's becoming too much of a nuisance.
>
>
> I've fixed the problem. For those interested, this had to do with failing
> to detect the "In file included from xxx.c" errors in the gcc output. Any
> number of such conditions for the same file should be posted as an error,
> but wasn't.
I can't find where your fix was ever pushed. Am I missing something?
Ken
- Re: master updated (5fdf4fc -> 67c3a3a),
Ken Brown <=