[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image transformations
From: |
Alan Third |
Subject: |
Re: Image transformations |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:10:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) |
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 06:12:11PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> So you are saying that a Lisp program needs to explicitly request
> ImageMagick if it wants to, say, rotate the image by 45 degrees?
Yes.
> If so, I guess either the ImageMagick capabilities should not be
> part of the list we return, or the function should accept an
> additional argument which is the image type. The latter sounds like
> entering the area of diminishing returns, since if the caller needs
> to specify imagemagick as the type, then the caller already knows
> what will be returned as the value, right?
Yes.
> So on balance, I think we should return a list of either 2 values or
> (on Windows 9X) 1 value, and that's it. WDYT?
That sounds good to me. We can then provide a fallback to ImageMagick
within create-image, as we’ll be able to tell when native transforms
aren’t available.
--
Alan Third
- Re: Image transformations, (continued)
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/29
- Re: Image transformations, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/29
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/30
- Re: Image transformations, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/30
- Re: Image transformations, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/29
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/30
- Re: Image transformations,
Alan Third <=
- Re: Image transformations, Tak Kunihiro, 2019/06/18
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13