Re: Function to retrieve package version

[Michael Albinus]

"Paul W. Rankin" <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, May 22 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Richard means the manual whjch the FSF prints and sells.  If it's
>> too large, it will be more expensive.
>>
>> But there's a way to have that cake and eat it, too: we can have
>> certain portions of the manual conditioned by @ifnottex.  We already
>> do that for some less important topics.  So there's no need to argue
>> about this particular case.
>
> Makes sense. But getting immediate pushback just means I won't be
> contributing the topic.

In the given case, I believe it is not mandatory to document the whole
lisp-mnt package. It would suffice to document `lm-header' in the node
"(elisp) Library Headers".

Best regards, Michael.