|
From: | Juri Linkov |
Subject: | Re: Merge-base alias for git vc-diff |
Date: | Sun, 06 Jan 2019 00:28:00 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> The only problem is that then we have to use different amount of dots >> for vc-root-diff and vc-print-root-log because in git: ‘git diff >> A...B’ corresponds to ‘git log A..B’ whereas ‘git diff A..B’ >> corresponds to ‘git log A...B’ > > Really? Ugh, that unfortunate. Well we could just live with it or use > different symbols to abstract it away. Another question is whether to use the same Git syntax for other dVCSes? It seems that finding a common ancestor is a common task among them: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6743068/merge-base-analog-for-mercurial-and-bzr-to-find-common-ancestors-as-possible-fo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |