[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell* |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:06:53 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> (progn (sit-for 100)
> (message "!!!"))
>
> The *shell* buffer got still filled, but the !!! message only appeared
> after I had hit a key.
FWIW, that looks correct to me. Eli seems to disagree, so it shows that
this part of the semantics of sit-for is murky.
Stefan
- while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/09/24
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/09/24
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/25
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/09/25
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/25
- Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/29
- BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT (was: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*), Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/25
- Re: BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT (was: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*), Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/25
- Re: BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/25
- Re: BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/25
- Re: BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/25
- Re: BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/25