[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
|
From: |
Michael Albinus |
|
Subject: |
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:37:14 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> > I do prefer live-p, but I'm not bothered-p either.
>>
>> If nobody objects next days, I'll change the name. It's not too late, I
>> believe.
>
> It's fine with me to rename, but since we already released Emacs 26.1
> with this API, we will need to leave behind an obsolete alias.
Will do. For the emacs-26 branch, or master? I'd prefer the former, in
order not to see too much code in the wild with the obsolete name.
> Thanks.
Best regards, Michael.