Re: Making 'eq' == 'eql' in bignum branch

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I think references to most-positive-fixnum (and implicit ones, like
>> using Frandom without an argument) should be eliminated. Fixnum range
>> is now an implementation detail.
> That is too radical, IMO.

I think what Pip is saying is that we should review all *uses* of
most-positive-fixnum, because it's very likely that many/most of them
are now wrong or suboptimal.

That doesn't mean we should remove most-positive-fixnum itself.


        Stefan