Re: `interactive-form` symbol property

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 08:32:45 -0400
> 
> > Any reason you dislike the interactive-form property so much that you
> > are willing to promote anything else instead? ;-)
> 
> The main reason is NIH, of course.

Of course ;-)

> But more generally when we have a mechanism (advice) that provides
> a superset of the other (interactive-form), I think it's always
> worthwhile to try and see if we really need to keep both.

Supersets frequently impose overhead, because they try to solve a more
general problem.  Don't we have some overhead of this kind in this
case?