Re: A couple of questions and concerns about Emacs network security

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> Is this relevant to Emacs?  Given the explanations by Lars here:
>
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-06/msg00736.html
>
> having the GnuTLS related values low is by design, so that NSM (and
> the users) could be in control of what is allowed, instead of silently
> failing connections at a low level.  Am I missing something?

I don't think so, but I partially dropped the ball on this one, for
which I apologise.

I had meant to implement warnings for this stuff on the default `medium'
level instead of letting it remain on the `high' level, but I simply
forgot.  I'll be changing that on master hopefully sometime next week.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no