[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 20:01:38 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:35:34 +0000
> Cc: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
>
> rx.el uses a wordy syntax, somewhat analagously to Cobol 50 years ago.
> Its premiss is that it's the terse, dense, austere characters which make
> a regexp difficult to write and read. I would suggest that it's more
> the abstract concepts which cause beginners difficulties, rather than
> the syntax. This was true of Cobol 50 years ago, and I think it's
> always been the case with regexps.
I actually agree with the premise: reading an rx spec of a regexp is
much easier than reading the regexp itself.
> That said, rx.el is used ~72 times in 19 files.el in Emacs, so somebody
> likes it.
I certainly do (but I'm not responsible for those uses).
- Re: Off Topic, (continued)
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Alan Mackenzie, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Yuri Khan, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Alan Mackenzie, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Richard Stallman, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544), Richard Stallman, 2018/05/24
- Re: Off Topic (was: bug#31544),
Eli Zaretskii <=