[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2018 22:34:56 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > > I don't think HTML rendering per se is the problem. The problem is
> > > when the MUA automatically fetches stuff referenced in the email as a
> > > URL pointing to some server.
> >
> > Indeed, that's what does it -- but this is a part of HTML rendering,
> > isn't it?
> Not a necessary part, no. E.g., Rmail invokes shr.el to render an
> HTML body while disabling image loading, and since shr.el doesn't
> support CSS, it doesn't fetch CSS, either.
We are miscommunicating. What I meant is that this operation, if and
when it is done, is part of HTML rendering. I am sorry I didn't make
that clear.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/20
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/21
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Joost Kremers, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/17
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?,
Richard Stallman <=