[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pcase-if-let?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: pcase-if-let? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2018 03:52:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Oh, right we need the `let*` kind of scoping.
I call it `if-matching' for now (like in "if [given clauses are]
matching [do this else that]").
Apropos "let*": I realized it's semantically absolutely the same as
`pcase-let*' but executing an else branch when not all patterns match
(what pcase-let* silently assumes). So I guess I should rather look how
these are implemented.
Michael.
- pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Davis Herring, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/30
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/30
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/30
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/30