Re: State of the overlay tree branch?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Sebastian Sturm <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:11:16 +0100
> 
> since noverlay performs so well, I guess the technical issue here is 
> already solved and I'll just have to wait for it to make it into the 
> master branch.

As Stefan points out, the overlays are not the reason.  The reason are
the number of markers in the buffer; each overlay defines 2 markers.
And there could be many markers in a buffer even if there are no
overlays.

Btw, why do you have so many overlays in these buffers?  Is this part
of lsp-mode implementation, or is the reason unrelated?