Re: Lisp primitives and their calling of the change hooks

[Alan Mackenzie]

Hello, Stefan.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:36:55 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > is surely negligible, and it is not at all clear that the latter (which
> > can have simpler hook functions) would be slower than the former (which
> > may need elaborate special handling).

> I'm very far from convinced about the "elaborate special handling".

Well, you agree that there're no advantages to having unbalanced change
hooks, so what does it matter how elaborate or not the special handling
is?  It will be necessary.  If we converted all change hooks to being
balanced it would not be necessary.

>         Stefan

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).