[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 19:31:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noam Postavsky <address@hidden> writes:
> Binding `byte-compile-debug' to non-nil should let it signal errors.
I've changed the test to
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(ert-deftest thunk-let-bad-binding-test ()
"Test whether a bad binding causes a compiler error."
(let ((byte-compile-debug t))
(should-error (byte-compile '(thunk-let ((x 1 1)) x)))
(should-error (byte-compile '(thunk-let (27) x)))
(should-error (byte-compile '(thunk-let x x)))))
#+end_src
Thanks,
Michael.
- Re: `thunk-let'?, (continued)
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/27
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/27
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/27
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/23
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Gemini Lasswell, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Noam Postavsky, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22
- Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/08